RESUMEN
Introduction: The COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in an increased use of Powered Air Purifying Respirators (PAPRs), by health care providers to mitigate the risk of viral transmission, especially for aerosol-generating procedures. In this study, we evaluate communication devices that could be used concurrently with PAPRs to promote improved communication. Methods: We tested two devices, a Bluetooth earpiece and a throat microphone that operated over mobile networks, against a control scenario in a simulated operating room environment with participants donning PAPRs. Participants read a short paragraph to each other, transcribed short phrases, and evaluated the scenarios according to speech intelligibility, ease of use, and comfort. Results: There were 30 participants of varying PAPR experience. The Bluetooth headset had the most accurate transcriptions, followed by control, and lastly the neckpiece (94.7%vs 88.4%vs 76%, p<0.001). Conclusion: Communication devices have the potential to bridge but also worsen communications barriers between providers donning PAPRs.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The use of epidural analgesia for laboring women is generally unavailable at public hospitals in Guyana despite favorable utilization rates in private institutions. In 2014, a healthcare team completed a targeted mission aimed at neuraxial analgesia training of providers at the preeminent public hospital in Georgetown, Guyana. This study evaluates the impact of the training, including provider attitudes, use, and barriers. METHODS: A prospective, mixed methods study of all obstetric, nursing, and anesthesiology providers at Georgetown Public Hospital Corporation was completed. Quantitative assessment of the posttraining use of epidural analgesia at 2 and 6 months was documented. Provider surveys were distributed anonymously at 2 months posttraining. Targeted interviews were completed from a random sampling of providers at 6 months; qualitative analysis of interviews formulated the basis for reporting limitations and barriers. RESULTS: Providers surveyed included 7 anesthesia providers and 24 obstetrics providers. Respondents believed Guyanese women should be offered epidural analgesia (93%), epidurals could be performed safely (87%), and Guyana has the resources necessary for routine use (81%). In assessing epidural knowledge, anesthesia providers achieved 60% correct response rate compared to 84% among obstetrics providers. Nurse anesthetists placed 16 epidurals following training. However, placement ceased after 2 months. The largest barriers to placement were unavailable anesthesia staff (63%), lack of supplies (16%), and insufficient nursing staff to monitor patients with epidurals (11%). CONCLUSIONS: A 1-week mission achieved widespread Guyanese provider acceptance despite a lack of previous experience. However, barriers proved insurmountable to achieving a sustainable, independently functioning epidural analgesia program.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Use of ketamine in the prehospital setting may be advantageous due to its potent analgesic and sedative properties and favorable risk profile. Use in the military setting has demonstrated both efficacy and safety for pain relief. The purpose of this study was to assess ketamine training, use, and perceptions in the civilian setting among nationally certified paramedics (NRPs) in the United States. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey of NRPs was performed. The electronic questionnaire assessed paramedic training, authorization, use, and perceptions of ketamine. Included in the analysis were completed surveys of paramedics who held one or more state paramedic credentials, indicated "patient care provider" as their primary role, and worked in non-military settings. Descriptive statistics were calculated. RESULTS: A total of 14,739 responses were obtained (response rate=23%), of which 10,737 (73%) met inclusion criteria and constituted the study cohort. Over one-half (53%) of paramedics reported learning about ketamine during their initial paramedic training. Meanwhile, 42% reported seeking ketamine-related education on their own. Of all respondents, only 33% (3,421/10,737) were authorized by protocol to use ketamine. Most commonly authorized uses included pain management (55%), rapid sequence intubation (RSI; 72%), and chemical restraint/sedation (72%). One-third of authorized providers (1,107/3,350) had never administered ketamine, with another 32% (1,070/3,350) having administered ketamine less than five times in their career. Ketamine was perceived to be safe and effective as the vast majority reported that they were comfortable with the use of ketamine (94%) and would, in similar situations (95%), use it again. CONCLUSION: This was the first large, national survey to assess ketamine training, use, and perceptions among paramedics in the civilian prehospital setting. While training related to ketamine use was commonly reported among paramedics, few were authorized to administer the drug by their agency's protocols. Of those authorized to use ketamine, most paramedics had limited experience administering the drug. Future research is needed to determine why the prevalence of ketamine use is low and to assess the safety and efficacy of ketamine use in the prehospital setting. Buckland DM , Crowe RP , Cash RE , Gondek S , Maluso P , Sirajuddin S , Smith ER , Dangerfield P , Shapiro G , Wanka C , Panchal AR , Sarani B . Ketamine in the prehospital environment: a national survey of paramedics in the United States. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2018;33(1):23-28.
